Categories: Market News

Treasury’s Market Role: New Research Ignites Discussion

A newly published white paper has ignited controversy on Wall Street and in Washington by accusing the Treasury Department of using short-term Treasury bills to manipulate the economy for political gain, potentially reigniting inflation.

The paper, released last week, contends that the Treasury’s strategy of financing a substantial portion of the U.S. debt with short-term Treasury bills is a deliberate attempt to influence the economy. Authors Stephen Miran and Nouriel Roubini have termed this approach “activist Treasury issuance.”

“By adjusting the maturity profile of its debt issuance, Treasury is dynamically managing financial conditions and, through them, the economy, usurping core functions of the Federal Reserve,” wrote Miran and Roubini.

The Treasury Department has robustly denied these allegations, and numerous bond-market experts have also questioned the paper’s conclusions. Lou Crandall, chief economist at Wrightson ICAP, stated in a report to MarketWatch, “Treasury issuance over the past year has evolved in ways consistent both with its historical behavior and recent Treasury guidance. The Treasury is simply following its stated plans.”

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen also refuted the claims, telling MarketWatch, “There is absolutely no such strategy. We have never discussed anything of the sort.” Her statement first appeared in a Bloomberg News report.

Miran and Roubini argue that the Treasury’s excess issuance of bills over the past nine months has had an impact equivalent to roughly $800 billion in quantitative easing, akin to reducing the 10-year yield by 25 basis points or the federal-funds rate by a full percentage point. They assert this has countered the Federal Reserve’s efforts to tighten monetary policy and cool the economy.

Senator Bill Hagerty, a Tennessee Republican, echoed these concerns, suggesting that the Treasury’s reliance on bills is politically motivated. In a statement to MarketWatch, he said, “Politics has no place in Treasury debt issuance. Secretary [Janet] Yellen’s Treasury has manipulated long-term interest rates by dramatically shifting the maturities of U.S. debt to boost the economy before November. This back-door quantitative easing undermines public trust in our nation’s debt and risks our government’s ability to respond to future crises.”

A Treasury official, speaking anonymously, criticized the paper for misrepresenting the guidance issued by the Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee (TBAC). The official emphasized that the 15% to 20% range recommended by TBAC is a guideline, not a rule, allowing for flexibility. They noted that the shift toward more bill issuance was more modest than the paper suggests and that the Treasury has been gradually reducing its issuance of bills as a share of net new debt issued.

Despite these denials, some experts see merit in the paper’s arguments. Bob Elliott, CEO of Unlimited and former chief of foreign-exchange policy at Bridgewater Associates, questioned why the Treasury hasn’t reduced the share of bills more quickly, noting that current economic conditions do not require significant easing.

The idea that the Treasury might be working against the Fed’s efforts first gained traction after the department’s quarterly refunding announcement for the fourth quarter on November 1. The bond market was experiencing turmoil, with the yield on the 10-year Treasury note hitting its highest level in over 15 years.

Guy LeBas, chief fixed-income strategist at Janney Montgomery Scott, pointed out that while the Treasury’s actions might influence financial conditions, other factors, such as the Federal Reserve’s stance on interest rates, also play a significant role.

Miran defended the use of TBAC guidance as a benchmark, stating it was the only suitable reference provided by the Treasury. He argued that the Treasury has not provided a convincing reason for its continued reliance on bills.

Details from the next quarterly Treasury refunding announcement are expected on Wednesday, while the Federal Reserve will announce its latest decision on interest rates later in the day.

ABC Trader

Recent Posts

Why the S&P 500 Is 25% Overvalued

Currently, the market appears to be sentiment-driven, leaving the bulls on shaky ground. The S&P…

1 hour ago

S&P 500 Surge: A Faster Bull Cycle Ahead?

Morgan Stanley’s Andrew Slimmon: ‘It’s hard to see the market correcting before year-end.’ The S&P…

1 day ago

2025 Profit Forecasts: Risk or Opportunity?

High Valuations Raise the Stakes as Q4 Earnings Forecasts Decline As the year winds down,…

2 days ago

Master Volatility with ATR and Smart Stops

Adaptability is the foundation of successful trading. Markets are ever-changing, shifting in speed, volatility, and…

3 days ago

Fed Alert: What It Means for Investors

Bears Are Eyeing This Stock-Market Predictor — But It’s Rarely Right The “Fed model” isn’t…

3 days ago

Advanced Market Strategies for Pros

Unlock the potential of day trading with two of the most dynamic futures market: the…

3 days ago